× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Mcsec in Timestamp, is it possible?
  • From: bvining@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Feb 01 09:16:13 CST

In V4R3 the MI architecture was updated to reflect a 8-microsecond
granularity for time resolution.  From an implementation point of view
one might find it is 8-microsecond on earlier RISC releases also.
CISC is 1024-microseconds.

Bruce

>
>According to the MI-manual, the timestamp counter increments once
>every 1024 microseconds, so it may be hard to get the microseconds.
>


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.