× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Sockets vs MQSeries
  • From: "McCallion, Martin" <MccalliM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:00:58 -0000

Stephane said:

> I developped an interface on as400 with linux machine. 
> I wrote this interface using sockets in RPG (Client and server side) 
> It works very good. 
> Speed, length of source code, size of object are nice. 

> Some guys talk me about MqSeries and said it is better and more
'STANDARD' 
> than sockets. 
> I don't know MQseries. 

And Dean answered: 

> I don't know who those "guys" are, but they need to wake up.  MQSeries
is 
> (now) an IBM product.  Sockets go anywhere, and are certainly more
"standard" 
> than MQSeries.  MQ was developed before there _were_ sockets on the
AS/400.   
> The only way I can envision MQ being better than sockets is that MQ
has many 
> recovery abilities built in...sockets can be a little "iffy" in this
regard. 

True enough about standards.  But MQSeries is a very good way to go if
you want guaranteed once-and-once-only message delivery, along with a
simple API, across a wide range of platforms and network protocols
(well, ok, two network protocols).  Of course, you do have to pay for
it.

Actually, I'm fairly sure that, when using IP as the transport, MQSeries
uses sockets under the covers.

Personally, I think MQSeries is an immensely strong technology that IBM
doesn't market nearly as hard as they should, probably because they
don't realise what they've got.

Now what does that remind me of...

Cheers,

Martin.

--                                                                     
Martin McCallion                 
Midas-Kapiti International
Work:  mccallim@midas-kapiti.com
Home: martin.mccallion@ukonline.co.uk

Apologies for the length of this sig, but company policy says:
This email message is intended for the named recipient only.  It may be
privileged and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended named
recipient of this email then you should not copy it or use it for any
purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.  You should
contact Midas-Kapiti International as shown below so that we can take
appropriate action at no cost to yourself.

Midas-Kapiti International Ltd, 1 St George's Road, Wimbledon, London,
SW19 4DR, UK
Email: Postmaster@midas-kapiti.com Tel: +44 (0)208 879 1188 Fax: +44
(0)208 947 3373
Midas-Kapiti International Ltd is registered in England and Wales under
company no. 971479 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.