• Subject: RE: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon Scre en
  • From: "Draper, Dale" <dale.draper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:04:05 -0800

I think he did mention making sure that your AS400 IP is on the PC's hosts
file. If you do not have a *hosts* file, edit the hosts.sam, adding your
AS400's name and IP and then save as *hosts*. 
I beleive that is what he was suggesting anyway.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Giusto [SMTP:JGiusto@patuxent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:01 AM
> To:   'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject:      RE: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon
> Scre en
> 
> 27.3601%. (the highest on any one drive on the WRKDSKSTS screen is 72.2%).
> 
> It has been suggested that it has something to do with reverse DNS Lookup
> and that I should tell the 400 what the addresses are.  The problem with
> that is that they are dynamically assigned by the NT server and we are
> talking at least 50 users.  Unless there is a way to generically tell the
> 400 about a range of addresses.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Art Baker [SMTP:Art_Baker@baan.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 11:21 AM
> To:   'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject:      RE: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon
> Scre en
> 
> How full is your harddrive-wrksyssts. If your running over 80% it would be
> causing these long delays.
> Art 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Giusto [mailto:JGiusto@patuxent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:42 AM
> To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon Screen
> 
> 
> We are experiencing a very long delay when starting Client Access
> sessions.
> Sometimes it is taking 5 - 10 minutes to get to the signon screen.  This
> usually occurs when there is an interactive job that is taking a large
> amount of resources.  I have noticed that the job QTVDEVICE is running at
> Priority 50.
> My thought was to  change this priority to 20 or below so that users will
> stop complaining about the delay for the signon screen.  
> 
> The question is, where is the best place to do this?  I was thinking about
> changing the Class description, but have been unable to determine which
> one
> is being used, and I also do not what other jobs to use this priority
> (which
> would bring the system to it knees if there are other tasks that share
> this
> class/routing entry).
> 
> Thank you very much for any suggestions that you can offer.
> 
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].