|
Hi, I am currently writing a program with sockets. Besides TCP it makes use of UNIX domain sockets, for descriptor passing. The API description for sendmsg() states, that the _TARGET_ of the message must be running with the user identity of the sender or have *ALLOBJ. There is another API to do this give_descriptor (I think), which requires the same to stand for the _SOURCE_. What is the rationale behind having two APIs for the same purpose but with opposite security requirements? For the sendmsg(): it just makes unix to OS/400 portin harder, and doesn't add value. The same OS/400 allows ondinary users change the size of shared pools (why?), respond to operator messages (again, why?) and there may be more. Benjamin Budai +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.