• Subject: RE: Good Book and Interesting Thought?
  • From: "Alistair Rooney" <alistairr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:39:53 +0200
  • Importance: Normal

Hi Brad,

I'm no hardware expert, but I've always been under the impression that the
speed of the AS/400 comes from the fact that there are processors for this
and processors for that. Not just one big fat processor running the whole
show. (Although there is a main processor).

I've heard of OS/400 running on a ThinkPad, but I wonder if it's a good
thing or a bad thing in the light of the multi-processor set-up. It may not
take full advantage of the architecture.

Having said all of that, I do agree that IBM should be looking to port it
onto different platforms, but then this wouldn't sell their horribly marked
up hardware! ;)

Alistair

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
[mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Stone, Brad V (TC)
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:19 PM
To: 'ign_list@ignite400.org'; MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Good Book and Interesting Thought?


I just read "In the Beginning was the command Line" by Neal Stephenson.  I
got hooked on his writing after reading Snow Crash (a must read to any
techie).

It spoke of Windows, Mac, how the GUI makes users think they are hackers,
etc.  I agreed with most of what he had to say.

He also spoke about Linux and BeOS.  The interesting thing to me was how Be
Inc. started out making their OS hardware dependant.  (sound familiar?)
Then, to stay alive they ported BeOS to Mac and Mac Clones because they ran
on the same type of chips (gee, who also uses those same types of chips?).
Then, when Mac Clone went away, they also ported BeOS to Intel saving their
hides once again.  Very interesting survival method.

What made this interesting to me was that IBM seems to be doing the exact
opposite.  Instead of porting OS400 to other hardware (ie Intel), they are
importing everything else TO the AS400 (Apache, Linux, PASE, etc...).  Too
bad Neal didn't discuss this because I'm sure he would have had some
interesting viewpoints (I metioned this in my Amazon review I did, so maybe
he'll see it..hehe..)

Anyone have any thoughts on this?  Is IBM's strategy, exactly opposite of
Be, just half a dozen of the other, or a risky game?

Brad
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].