|
I don't think XML with take over the EDI World. Why change one set of standards for another? Many large corps have millions of dollars invested in traditional EDI systems. Why would they change to XML for little or no improvement? I think XML is a compliment to trad EDI in the sense that it can be used to get the last mile on EDI, smaller vendors who are unable to incapable or doing EDI. Send them an XML document that can be viewed in a web browser. Many of the EDI translators can now also produce XML, so you can have a single system generate a document in either EDI or XML format. Also, the misconception about EDI standards is that they are standard. You will NEVER receive EDI documents in all the same format/standard. The reason for this is because companies and industries do business differently and the EDI standards are merely a reflection of the way various companies/industries do business. It is a business issue and NOT a technical/EDI issue. I hear this argument/complaint all the time. If you never heard of EDI, do you all the paper POs from your customers look the same? Of course NOT. one customer may send you a single PO with a single ship to location, another may send you a single PO and at the detail level of the PO order 10 widgets and have you ship 1 widget to 10 different locations. Do you dis the paper POs as not being "standard", of course NOT. Some industries have attempted to create a subset implementation of an ANSI x.12 document in order to speed implementation in a certain industry segment. Basically, the customer sets the rules for EDI and the vendor does what ever it takes. I don't see XML changing that at all. Just my opinions. cjg Carl J. Galgano EDI Consulting Services, Inc. 540 Powder Springs Street, Suite C19 Marietta, GA 30064 (770) 422-2995 - voice (419) 730-8212 - fax mailto:cgalgano@ediconsulting.com http://www.ediconsulting.com AS400 EDI, Networking, E-Commerce and Communications Consulting and Implementation http://www.icecreamovernight.com Premium Ice Cream Brands shipped Overnight "You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know" - rw -----Original Message----- From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of L. S. Russell Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:55 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: XML Attributes I agree, XML is another good thing but it isn't a cure all. When we implemented our EDI (about 12 vendors, and almost double that number of distributors) we went to Tampa for QRS training. The one thing I brought back from that class was that all theses standards (X.12, XML ...) are not standard. Each partner has a different set of requirements for each of the document types. Some abide by the functional acknowledgement and others, even though they require you to send it, ignore it as if they never got it. X.12 would work well, and not need replacing, if folks would understand that STANDARD MEANS STANDARD! "Stone, Brad V (TC)" wrote: > > > > > You really have a bee in your bonnet about XML taking over > > the EDI world ;-) > > > > Have a read of; > > > > [ > > http://www.xmls.com/resources/whitepapers/XMLSolutions_Peacefu > l_Co-Existence > .pdf ] > > >It might calm your nerves better than valium ;-) > > Actually I don't. I just hate it when all people talk is theory. Theory > only works in your head. Taking over the EDI world. That's what all IT is > about these days isn't it. If you don't create the next Napster, you're a > nobody. So, instead of coming up with new ideas, you rebrand something > existing as "Next Generation" and call it your own... sorry for the tangent. > :) > > I parused the document. Found it interesting that one point they try to use > to say XML is better than X.12 is you can "read" it with your eyes easier. > (they don't come right out and say it that way, but why else would they > point that out). > > A lot of pretty pictures too. Too bad real work isn't as easy as pictures. > It wouldnt at all be to their advantage that you use XML and possibly > purchase their product or services? > > Example from me... > > Data from AS/400-->replicate to NT-->display on web with cold fusion. > easy right? How about this... > Take order on internet with Cold fusion-->replicate to AS/400-->bill order. > > Easy right? Pffffft... Those --> contain about 10k lines of code and rules > that haven't even emerged yet. Ya, it's just "that easy". > > Give me three reasons why XML is better than X.12? I've asked this before. > Never did get an answer. > > Note: I don't hate XML. I'm not worried if I have to use it. Here's what > I hate: Hype, buzzwords, IT management who haven't programmed a lick of > code in their life and wouldn't know XML from Javascript but still think > that one thing like XML or Java will solve all problems that exist because > Joe Pundit in PC Week said so (who also hasn't programmed since punchcards). > > I also don't like anything that is labeled "Next Generation" except Star > Trek. > > Don't show me theory and pretty pictures, show me fact and real world > examples. Let me hear from the programmers who had to implement this, not > the project leaders who just hear "it's coming along ok". > > So far, I haven't seen XML as the savior that Java was claimed to be. :) > What do you think, Leslie? :) > > Brad > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.