• Subject: Re: Oops JOBQ perceptions
  • From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:17:14 -0600

No, last I looked at V4R4, level 50 was no different in that
respect than the lower levels. But it would be nice if
IBM was a bit more forthcoming with such details.
Security by obscurity is the weakest form of security
(if one could even use this word in that context).


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Shaw, David <dshaw@spartan.com>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Oops JOBQ perceptions


> Leif,
> 
> This is nit-picky, and I'm not certain my source was authoritative, but
> doesn't the system delete and re-create QTEMPs (like the /38 did) at Level
> 50 security?  Thanks!
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].