RE: Microsoft Security Failure (should have stayed with AS/400)

The phrase "quality-control" doesn't say anything explicit about the level
of quality desired. <g>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Svalgaard [mailto:leif@leif.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:03 AM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Microsoft Security Failure (should have stayed 
> with AS/400)
> 
> 
> > from Al Macintyre
> > News from another list that I am on, illustrating the high 
> price Microsoft
> is
> > paying for the decision to leave the most secure computer system
> manufacturer
> > in the world, because of pride in need to run their own 
> business on their
> own
> > creations before they really ready to handle that scale of 
> operations.
> 
> although I agree that the iSeries is superior to any other 
> box, I would like
> to
> point out a 'credo' Microsoft has: "eat you own dogfood", meaning that
> at almost any cost try your hardest to use your own products, not for
> marketing reasons but simply for quality-control (can't believe I said
> that, but that is at least their avowed goal).
> 
> 
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---