|
Can you elaborate on this without naming names? Seems to me the last time this thread was active, the consensus was that M$ tried moving the business processes that they ran on the 400 to an internal NT based system that didn't perform well and they ended up outsourcing the work to a vendor that used the 400. Is this what you've heard? > -----Original Message----- > From: jpcarr@TREDEGAR.COM [mailto:jpcarr@TREDEGAR.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 8:45 PM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: RE: Microsoft and AS/400 > > > > > <This story is becoming an Urban Legend.> > Booth > > Booth > It's not an urban legend. I've done the research. I've > talked to people > first hand. > john carr > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.