|
There are two misconceptions here, which I often see and decided to comment on. First, SNA is not more chatty than TCP/IP. If you will look at communications trace, SNA will deliver approximately the same amount of payload per same amount of LAN frames. SNA RUs do have longer headers than TCP/IP packets but the difference is insignificant. Second, while MPTN (aka ANYNET) certainly adds an overhead and slows things down, it is not encapsulation per se. MPTN uses different technique. It's true, that SNA requires more careful configuration - there are very few things you can actually configure in TCP/IP, which makes it easier to use. Non-optimal configuration can lead to excessive traffic and IOP utilization - which can explain your experience. Alexei Pytel Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@cross-check.com>@midrange.com on 10/04/2000 10:47:04 AM Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: SNA over IP SNA is very chatty. It will add to your network utilization. Also encapsulation any protocol over another adds over head. Thus the IOP processors have more work to do. If you are a very heavy user of the SNA, it will effect performance. I have 3 as400s all running ANYNET and it is fast on the 170 and 720. They both have PCI 10/100 Ethernet cards, with the 720 having two. The model 400 running an older SPD IPCS card at 10mb had a noticeable slow down. The change does not effect straight TCP/IP, just the IOP. If the IOP is overloaded, then you will notice a slow down of straight TCP/IP. We have not had any problems on either of the boxes with ANYNET. When IBM gets all the neat SNA function re-written to TCP/IP you will not need ANYNET, but till then... Tell me why do you need Anynet turned on? What is the application? HTH, Christopher K. Bipes mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com Sr. Programmer/Analyst mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com CrossCheck, Inc. http://www.cross-check.com 6119 State Farm Drive Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102 Rohnert Park CA 94928 Fax: 707 586-1884 If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here. Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Knight [mailto:jknight@rei.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 8:14 AM To: 'Midrange Users list' Subject: SNA over IP We are looking at utilizing APPC over IP via ANYNET. We have several processes that use IP sockets to look up data from our RS/6000s. I read in the Communications Configuration Manual that by activating ANYNET, our sockets programs will run slower. This is the V4R1 manual. Is this still true on V4R4?? +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.