|
Whether or not a system is brought to it's knees is dependent on the quality of the architecture of the application. I used MACPAC for 8 years (an ERP system that competed with BPCS, JDE, etc). It used full journaling and commitment control and performance was fine. But - Andersen bothered to build in the journaling properly. Part of this is to open files for input only where possible. Files opened for update will have all their reads journaled. So... MACPAC would often open the same file multiple times - once for read only operations, once for updates. This minimized the impact on the journals. It's easier for a programmer to just open a file once, but then all your reads get journaled. This causes some ERP systems to croak when journaling is turned on. If the app was built properly, it wouldn't be much of an issue. Many ERP software sales people perpetuated the 'myth' that journaling 'brings a system to it's knees'. What they should have said was that journaling brings _their software_ to it's knees. They used that excuse to get around the fact that their software didn't have proper commitment control built in. Journaling is good. Commitment control is AWESOME. But, it takes a LOT of work to do it properly. I had commitment control for all those 8 years and I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER had to go searching for a lost transaction due to a power failure or program bombing. NEVER. I NEVER had an unbalanced transaction. NEVER. The software FIXED ITSELF. I repeat - it was AWESOME. MACPAC was often behind in features and functions compared to the competition, but the technical architecture was clearly superior. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Improve performance on your AS/400 without a hardware upgrade! Move seldom used historical data out of the way but still access it where needed! ARCTOOLS(tm) for the IBM AS/400 http://www.arctools.com mailto:info@arctools.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com] On Behalf Of John Earl Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 9:34 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Journaling Does anyone know of a benchmark for journaling on the AS/400? I'm involved in a discussion with someone who refuses to believe that journaling will not bring a system to it's knees. I could create a test, but it would be better if this information came from some independent third party. Anybody have a reference from a reputable source? jte -- John Earl johnearl@400security.com The PowerTech Group --> new number --> 253-872-7788 PowerLock Network Security www.400security.com -- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.