× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Java
  • From: "L. S. Russell" <leslier@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:29:37 -0500
  • Organization: Datrek Professional Bags

Just wanted to show that Java is actually in a flux state among the
people who put it on the map.  Those open source developers are calling
for a change in the way Sun has been handling Java and I feel that it is
coming to a head.  

Ted Barry wrote:
> 
> Makes no difference to our organization, we're sticking to tried and true
> RPG/RPGIV/RPG ILE/and now.........e-RPG.
> 
> >>> "L. S. Russell" <leslier@datrek.com> 08/23/00 10:28am >>>
> Poll circulating on the Web.
> 
> A poll circulating among various developer groups is asking for a vote
> on
> whether Sun should make Java open source. Kevin Burton, the
> developer
> who organized the poll, calls Java
> "broken." He says that depending on the results of the poll, he may ask
> the open source community to drop Java in
> favor of a clean-room implementation such as a Classpath/GNU compiler.
> 
> "Java isn't getting ported to non-popular operating systems, isn't
> getting new features, isn't solid," says Burton, who
> created the Apache Jetspeed and Alexandria projects and founded
> www.openprivacy.org. "I'm fine with letting
> Sun and the Java Community Process work out the language spec and
> high-level features, but the implementation
> should be done in an open manner."
> 
> This is not Burton's first go-around with Sun--in March he organized a
> petition asking
> Sun to open some of its Java tools. However, Sun is increasingly
> entwined with
> various open source organizations--including the Apache
> Foundation--and
> said last
> week it is depending on open source developers to help build an open
> systems
> competitor to Microsoft.Net. That effort revolves around StarOffice and
> the Gnome
> interface, which will both be available under the GNU Public License.
> 
> Opinion so far is divided. As of Monday, 28.8 percent of developers
> voting said there
> was nothing wrong with Sun's Java licensing, while 26 percent said
> Java
> should also
> be made available under the GPL.
> 
> Burton thinks all of Java should be developing the way the Tomcat
> project is
> developing under Apache's sponsorship. Sun donated its reference
> implementation for
> Java servlets and Java Server Pages to Tomcat after its own Java Web
> server was
> dropped by iPlanet (the Sun-Netscape alliance). The goal is to create an
> open source Java-enabled Web server
> for the industry. Burton says Sun's Java Community Process controls the
> Java servlet specification and Tomcat
> controls the implementation.
> 
> A Sun spokeswoman says developers should approach the Java
> Community
> Process with ideas on Java
> development and not Sun.
> 
> Until Sun makes a decision on opening Java, getting a Java license can
> mean a battle. Cleanroom Java vendor
> Tower Technology announced that after over three years of negotiating
> it
> has finally been granted a license to
> Java 2. Tower is also participating in Sun's Java Community Process and
> is working with Sun engineers on
> passing Sun's compatibility tests. Tower specializes in improving
> server-side Java performance and is aiming its
> technology at XML servers, personalization portals, data mining, and B2B
> exchanges.
> 
> "This erases customers' concerns, opens more channels of distribution
> for us, and allows a free exchange of
> information between us and other Java licensees," says Tower VP
> Madison
> Cloutier.
> 
> Tower's chief competitor is IBM, which last week licensed the IBM Java
> developer kit for Linux to
> Inprise/Borland. An IBM spokesman says IBM believes it is within the
> rights of its Sun license to redistribute a
> compatible Java runtime.
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to
> MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.