|
Janet, all, I've been watching this little thread and after a bit of thought it makes perfect business sense. Let's say that IBM rebrands their Netfinity, RS/6000 and AS/400 into something like eServer2k or AS/6000 or Netfinity/400 or whatever. The real strength that IBM has had in the midrange market is partially due to a loyal (vocal) user base. Not to mention that the AS/400 is a rock solid machine. But you knew that ;) Now, from my own personal experience as a former business partner some of the folks at IBM are notorious for under sizing the machine to meet the user's needs just to get in the door. Once committed, the hook is set and down the upgrade path you go. It's no different than IBM selling a 170 then announcing a new machine that leaves your 170 in the back parking lot, 'cause you can't get there from where you're at. You have to buy a new machine. This news is an expansion of that same tactic but IBM can use the newly branded machine running *nix as bait. Once in the door, as the customer grows they will eventually hear: "You need to replace your processor with a (whatever the AS/400 will be called by then)." Those things that separate OS/400 from the other OS's will be the rung on the evolutionary ladder that the smaller machines will may or may not ever reach. Who knows, maybe some day the PASE will fade away to where you can have multiple cards in a box, one running NT/2000, one running AIX, one running Linux, and another running OS/400 and if you opened up the box you would find a tiny LAN/SAN. Instead of having a 24 box NT farm, you have a 24 cpu AS/400 box. But whatever happens, it's a perfect opportunity to test Darwins theory of adaptability ;-) jkrueger@andrewscg.com wrote: > > >> Hey, > > >> Under the "I just wanted to be the first to say it" department > > >> Who's going to the LAST(?) AS/400 COMMON ?? > > >> John Carr > > >> http://www.informationweek.com/797/ibm.htm > <<... Sources say Gerstner and Palmisano have all but signed off on a plan > to unify IBM's Netfinity, > RS/6000, AS/400, and mainframe servers under a single brand by the fourth > quarter.>> > > What a depressing thought, John... Even if the rebranding occurs, and IBM > continues to fail at advertising what was the AS/400, won't there still be a > midrange user community with a lot in common that would still want to continue > meeting and learning from one another? Surely the user community doesn't have > to vanish even if the AS/400 ends up in a masquerade costume, does it??? > > I'll be in Baltimore, but I sure don't want it to be the last conference... > > What does everyone else think??? > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.