|
The first two units on your system comprise a mirrored pair. The other 10 units are RAID-5 protected. The parity data is stored on 8 disk arms. The arms containing parity data are the ones whose size are 3670. The maximum number of arms in a single RAID set is 10, this RAID set is full. A system this old might have an IOP that is incapable of supporting more than one RAID set. The minimum drives in a new RAID set is four. I hope that you have considered that. Considering the percent-used on the disk, after you add new disk units, you should use DSKBAL to re-spread your objects. Otherwise, you may experience a performance issue. If you add DASD to this IOP, the IOP may become overloaded and you may experience a performance issue when the system is under high stress. This is a complex issue, not easily described in one or two sentences. Adding memory to this system could reduce page faulting and smooth out the effect of the overloaded disk IOP. Richard Jackson mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net www.richardjacksonltd.com Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058 Fax: 1 (303) 663-4325 -----Original Message----- From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of oludare Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:40 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: AS/400 UPGRADE Guys, I am on a 510-2143 system and currently about 42Gig (see below), this is only a DASD, MEMORY and OS400 upgrade. I think I have RAID dasd system from your discussions. I have included DISK configuration below for clarity. Thanks all for your input. Display Disk Configuration Protection Serial Resource ASP Unit Number Type Model Name Protection 1 Mirrored 1 00-0BB9617 6607 030 DD001 Controller 1 00-0BD2365 6607 030 DD002 Controller 3 00-0F33908 6607 070 DD012 Device Parity 4 00-0F43768 6607 072 DD011 Device Parity 5 00-0BB8603 6607 072 DD010 Device Parity 6 00-0BC1727 6607 072 DD009 Device Parity 7 00-0BC2962 6607 072 DD008 Device Parity 8 00-0F37094 6607 072 DD007 Device Parity 9 00-0BB7222 6607 070 DD006 Device Parity 10 00-0F43363 6607 072 DD005 Device Parity 11 00-0BB9159 6607 072 DD004 Device Parity 12 00-0F43632 6607 072 DD003 Device Parity Display Disk Configuration Capacity ----Protected--- ---Unprotecte d-- ASP Unit Type Model Threshold Overflow Size %Used Size %Used 1 90% No 41943 94.57% 0 0.00% 1 6607 030 4194 94.51% 0 0.00% 1 6607 030 4194 94.51% 0 0.00% 3 6607 070 4194 94.61% 0 0.00% 4 6607 072 3670 94.88% 0 0.00% 5 6607 072 3670 94.52% 0 0.00% 6 6607 072 3670 94.78% 0 0.00% 7 6607 072 3670 94.43% 0 0.00% 8 6607 072 3670 94.60% 0 0.00% 9 6607 070 4194 94.45% 0 0.00% 10 6607 072 3670 94.54% 0 0.00% 11 6607 072 3670 94.44% 0 0.00% 12 6607 072 3670 94.50% 0 0.00% ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Bipes" <chris.bipes@cross-check.com> To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:33 AM Subject: RE: AS/400 UPGRADE > For the hardware compatibility. The older software may not handle the new > memory or dasd. But again it may. You your self warn about the > pre-requisites. You do have a valid point about spreading the OS across the > new drives, but then there is the new disk balancing that is available with > V4R3 and even better in V4R4. The V4R4 version is even better than the > spread when loading the tapes. Also, they are only upgrading the OS so the > data will not be touched and not spread across the new drives. > > > > Christopher K. Bipes mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com > Sr. Programmer/Analyst mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com > CrossCheck, Inc. http://www.cross-check.com > 6119 State Farm Drive Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102 > Rohnert Park CA 94928 Fax: 707 586-1884 > > If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here. > Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Allen, Stu [mailto:sallen@fellowes.com] > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 3:32 AM > To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' > Subject: RE: AS/400 UPGRADE > > > Chris, > Out of interest, why? > Extra memory would make the software u/g quicker, and the extra disk would > ensure that the LPP libraries would be spread over more disk arms... > > Dare, concentrate on the s/w upgrade. As long as you meet pre-requisites, > (which your hardware vendor should be able to confirm), disk, memory, and no > protection->raid are a piece of cake. > > Regards, > Stuart > > Stuart Allen > European Systems Analyst, Fellowes > mailto:sallen@fellowes.com > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.