× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Qualified vs Unqualified calls (Was: Database server jobs and SQL tuning)
  • From: "Simon Coulter" <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 May 00 22:51:55 +1000


Hello John,

Interesting exercise.  I didn't bother to respond earlier even though I didn't 
believe 
the original premise.  I simply said "Bollocks" and discarded the note.  I'm 
feeling a 
little more loquacious this evening.  It only takes a little thought to 
disprove the 
premise.  The benchmark evidence is useful for substantiation.

It is true that a qualified call requires two resolutions: Resolve library then 
resolve object, therefore requiring the compiler or MI programmer to issue two 
calls 
to RSVLSP.
        1 - Resolve context
        2 - Use pointer to resolved context when resolving object

However a call to RSVLSP with no context information results in the name 
resolution 
list (what you know as the *LIBL) being searched linearly.  The NRL can contain 
15 
system libraries, 25 user libraries, 2 product libraries, and the current 
library, and 
even though the NRL contains resolved pointers (an array of 43 system 
pointers), 
resolving the actual object requires a call to RSLVSP for each entry in the NRL 
until 
the object is found -- in the worst case a total of 43 resolutions.

Note that the above is not true when resolving an object that can only exist in 
the 
machine context.  In that case a single resolution is performed.

Ergo, a qualified call is faster than an unqualified call when the NRL contains 
more 
than two contexts. Quod erat demonstrandum!

None of which has any bearing on whether qualified calls are a good idea or not!

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
«» FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists       «»
«» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400.  «»
«»                                                                «»
«» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175      Mobile: +61 0411 091 400           «»
«» Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175      mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au      «»
«»                                                                «»
«» Windoze should not be open at Warp speed.                      «»
«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.