× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: BISYNC vs ASYNCH programming
  • From: Eric Kempter <noerick.norcal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 09:03:22 -0700
  • Organization: Norcal

James,
     This is strictly a software issue on our side.  My trading partner is 
willing to use ASYNCH.

On Saturday, May 13, 2000 2:15 AM, James W. Kilgore 
[SMTP:eMail@James-W-Kilgore.com] wrote:
| Eric,
| 
| The purpose of most EDI packages is not just to get data from point A to
| point B, but to verify that the data was delivered and done so
| accurately.
| 
| At it's simplest, bisync is handled by a pair of programs (one at each
| end) that does a batch transmission of a file.  This can be replaced
| with FTP and appropriate byte count and check digit controls to provide
| a degree of confidence in delivery.
| 
| What this vendor may have is the EDI mapping within the bisync
| communications program and performs their translation and verification
| on a record by record or order by order basis.
| 
| Now that's a different story.
| 
| (thinking out loud) Instead of having the EDI communications running,
| one could create an umbrella loop that uses FTP to send an order,
| verify, process, feedback.  Sort of like producing a report by opening
| and closing the spool file on each page (one page = one order) while the
| spool writer chugs away at what it's received.  There is a performance
| penalty.
| 
| IMHO, by now, with the current technology, they should have figured this
| out, on their own dime.  Is there a trading partner issue that must be
| addressed?  Like available communications protocols?
| 
| Ooops, I just heard the end of week, no thinking out loud buzzer go off.
| ;)
| 
| 
| Eric Kempter wrote:
| > 
| > Is there a great deal of difference in the programming of Bisynchronous
| > communications vs Asynchronous communications.  We purchased an EDI package
| > that uses Bisynch comms.  We asked the vendor for a quote on how much it
| > would cost to modify his package to support asynch comms.  He said it would
| > take him weeks to come up with a quote and then it would probably take
| > months to program.  Does this sound realistic.  TIA
| +---
| | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
| +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.