RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

The following combination:
WRKLIND
GO CFGTCP, Option 1 - Interfaces
WRKCTLD *CMN
Does the line name match from step 2 and 3?





DBale@lear.com on 05/10/2000 12:39:46 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

Sorry, PEBKAC.  

How would I determine these?

- Dan Bale

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Berendt [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:02 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> 
> <snip>
> By things being equal I mean does SNA and TCP/IP use 
> the same line descriptions on both 400's?
> <endsnip>
> 
> 
> DBale@lear.com on 05/10/2000 10:54:55 AM
> Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> cc:    
> Fax to:       
> Subject:      RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> 
> Like what?  PTFs?  Models?  other?
> 
> Models:  The 620 is sending it to a 720.
> 
> PTFs: should be current, but am not certain of this.
> 
> - Dan Bale
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Rob Berendt [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> > Sent:       Tuesday, May 09, 2000 2:50 PM
> > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > Subject:    RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> > 
> > v4r3 isn't bad.  Are all other things equal?
> > 
> > 
> > DBale@lear.com on 05/09/2000 12:22:51 PM
> > Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> > cc:  
> > Fax to:     
> > Subject:    RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> > 
> > The two boxes involved in my latest testing are both at V4R3.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:     Rob Berendt [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> > > Sent:     Monday, May 08, 2000 6:10 PM
> > > To:       MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > > Subject:  RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> > > 
> > > Dan, what version of OS/400 are you running?  I forget.  There 
> > > have been numerous enhancements to TCP/IP over the years.  All 
> > > things being equal between the 400's, then TCP/IP should smoke 
> > > SAVRSTOBJ.  By things being equal I mean does SNA and TCP/IP use 
> > > the same line descriptions on both 400's?
> > > I use SAVRSTOBJ for most of my distribution because I've not 
> > > written/purchased/downloaded TCP/IP equivalent wrappers.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---