|
I'm with you on this one, Save entire system periodically, say once a month for arguments sake(SAVSYS, SAVLIB *NONSYS etc) and after any changes. Save changing application data daily (application data libraries, configuration etc) Theres no point in backing up system libraries, or vendor application program libraries if they haven't changed. They way I verified my backup tapes in my ops days, was to do a DUPTAP of the tapes, that way you have an additional copy of the tapes, and also you have read the data from the tape, so if the DUPTAP fails, you schedule another backup, because you know your tapes might be duff! -----Original Message----- From: John Earl [mailto:johnearl@400security.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 8:40 PM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: Save while active? Eric, Eric Kempter wrote: > > They're not when you consider a complete backup solution which would include your SAVSYS, etc.. You touched one one of my pet peeves, so don't take this personally, but look out..... :^) <rant> I've known many an operations manager who feel compelled to get a "complete" save on a daily or even a weekly basis. For them a "complete" save included a SAVSYS, SAVLIB *NONSYS, SAVDLO and SAV (well actually, they often forget the SAV). The problem that I have with this is that a SAVSYS and a SAVLIB *NONSYS require a dedicated system. For many shops this means turning off access for _many_ hours. IMHO, this is unconscionable, and completely unnnecessary! To start with, a SAVSYS saves the operating system. How often do you need to do that? Does your operating system change daily, weekly, or even monthly? I submit that the answer for most shops is no. If that is the case in your shop, you could do two SAVSYS's after each OS/400 (or major cum package) upgrade, keep one on site and one offsite and be done with it. That leaves the SAVLIB *NONSYS. The differences between a SAVLIB *NONSYS and a SAVLIB *ALLUSR are that *NONSYS backs up IBM Licensed Program Product Libraries, and *NONSYS requires a dedicated system. If you were to do two SAVLIB *IBM at the same time that you did your two SAVSYS's (and store them with the SAVSYS's), you would eliminate the need for the SAVLIB *NONSYS because, again, how often do the IBM LPP's change on your system? Everything else that you want to backup is now available to Save While Active. And even if you don't do a Save While Active, eliminating a daily or weekly SAVSYS and SAVLIB *NONSYS will permit you to do a rolling application by application backup without taking your system down to a restricted state. As more and more shops move to 24x7 (which is a basic definition of an internet app, no?), eliminating the backup window becomes more and more important. If you were to eliminate the SAVSYS and the SAVLIB *IBM from the regular backup schedule (because you have already saved them separately), your back up plan might then look something like this: SAVSECDTA (used to be done for you by the SAVSYS) SAVCFG (used to be done for you by the SAVSYS) SAVLIB *ALLUSR (Get all non IBM libraries) SAVCHGOBJ (optional... as part of a daily backup) SAVDLO (if you are still using DLO's and still care) SAV (IFS and non QSYS.LIB file systems) None of these commands requires a restricted state, and the SAVLIB, SAVOBJ, SAVCHGOBJ, and SAV commands all support the Save While Active. The point of this rant is that a "complete" backup is often times done to the detriment of regular business functions. If the system is "down' on a regular basis backing up stuff that will ultimately not be usefull in a restore, we're hurting business operations for no good reason. After you have pieced a couple of systems back together from backup tapes you get a better idea of the true value of backups (that's why I always like at least two tape copies :). My experience has taught me that a weekly SAVSYS and SAVLIB *IBM is oftern overkill. </rant> jte -- John Earl johnearl@400security.com The PowerTech Group 206-575-0711 PowerLock Network Security www.400security.com -- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.