RE: Processor speed -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Just curious, do you have any benchmarks or other evidence to back this up?
I had always thought that sockets would be faster but had never delved into
it to determine whether that was true or not.  I would be really interested
in any references comparing the two.

Thanks,

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan M. Andelin [SMTP:nathanma@haaga.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 8:05 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: Processor speed
> 
> For example, many ported applications rely heavily on sockets for
> interprocess communication.  But data queue send and receive functions are
> twice as fast as socket send and receive.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.