Re: Long running backups to a 3590-B11

Al, can I assume that Group PTFs are included in cumes ?
Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Barsa, Jr." <barsa2@ibm.net>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Long running backups to a 3590-B11


> At 10:58 AM 04/06/2000 +0100, you wrote:
> >Has anyone else had a similar problem -
> >
> >I have a system with 102GB of DASD, running at about 80% used.  It has
> >regularly taken between 11 to 13 hours to do a full system backup each
> >weekend (SAVSYS + NONSYS + SAVDLO + SAV (ifs)).  All of a sudden, the
> >backups started taking 15/16 hours.  I have recently upgraded to v4r3
(from
> >v4r1), initiallly the backups jumped to 28 hours!!  IBM recommended we
apply
> >additional PTFs, a series of group-ptf packages, this cut the 28 to 18
but
> >this is still very painful to system availablility, as you can imagine.
> >
> >I am liaising with IBM and with the CE; I've stopped saving access paths,
> >I'm getting staff to delete old/redundant data, what more can I do?  Has
> >anyone had similar experiences or have some advice ?
>
> First of all, go back to saving access paths.  On a system with 102 GB of
> DASD, if you had to rebuild them you would a very unhappy puppy.
>
> Secondly, you need to understand that IBM did a very stupid thing in the
> middle of V4R4, which was to upgrade the database via PTF (i.e.: without a
> version/release/modification change).  I told them not to do this, but
they
> didn't listen.
>
> Because this upgrade failed to go through the normal release testing
> process, and because IBM is attempting to act in a mode that is *CHEAP,
> this caused lots of bugs to fall through the cracks.  Every legitimate bug
> leads to a PTF (*VERYEXPENSIVE [You wouldn't think so, but nevertheless
> this is what IBM claims.]).
>
> Ultimately PTF's get into a "Cumulative PTF Package", which gets a good
> amount of testing.
>
> However because of database changes, tape changes and Y2K changes, IBM has
> instituted a new set of PTF's called "group PTF's".  "Group PTF's" are not
> as extensively tested, to say the least.  (They resemble doing business
> like Micro$oft, but nevertheless this is what IBM is providing.)  I would
> recommend that all customers at V4R4 have the "group PTF's" for both
> database and Y2K.  In addition if you are running a 3570 or 3590, you need
> the "group PTF's" for save/restore.  There are other sets of "group PTF's"
> for the net, and things like that.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
> +--------------------------------------------------+
> | Please do not send private mail to this address. |
> | Private mail should go to barsa@ibm.net.         |
> +--------------------------------------------------+
>
> Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L
> Barsa Consulting, LLC.
> 400 > 390
>
> Phone: 914-251-1234
> Fax: 914-251-9406
> http://www.barsaconsulting.com
> http://www.taatool.com
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---