|
Hi gang -
>I'm right behind you. More opcodes don't equal better function.
...
>> Sorry Hans, I know these are great additions and everyone else will be
>> breathing hard for a week but I don't see a big difference between
>> this and a DO loop with a "downto" added for glamour.
Well, if you don't want more opcodes, get rid of DO; FOR is a lot more
flexible.
I like the fact that I can replace
eval x=1
dow x <= %elem(array)
* do something to array element x
eval x=x+1
enddo
with
for x=1 to %elem(array)
* do something to array element x
endfor
Ken
Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada, Inc.
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of
my employer or anyone else.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.