|
Hi gang - >I'm right behind you. More opcodes don't equal better function. ... >> Sorry Hans, I know these are great additions and everyone else will be >> breathing hard for a week but I don't see a big difference between >> this and a DO loop with a "downto" added for glamour. Well, if you don't want more opcodes, get rid of DO; FOR is a lot more flexible. I like the fact that I can replace eval x=1 dow x <= %elem(array) * do something to array element x eval x=x+1 enddo with for x=1 to %elem(array) * do something to array element x endfor Ken Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada, Inc. Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or anyone else. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.