× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: QRPLOBJ Library
  • From: "Goodbar, Loyd (AFS-Water Valley)" <LGoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:44:05 -0500

What about moving objects to MYRPLOBJ instead (a user library you would
create)? You would have total control over that library and be assured
OS/400 won't interfere with it. Your move/compile program then can make
decisions about the objects there. You might want to alter your startup
program to CLRLIB MYRPLOBJ.

Loyd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allen Overeem [SMTP:AOvereem@stvgb.org]
> Sent: Friday, 28 January, 2000 2:15 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: QRPLOBJ Library
> 
> Lurton wrote:
> ____________________________________________________________
> If you compile an object (pgm) with replace yes, it will create a
> duplicate
> of the object in QRPLOBJ with a strange name like Q34578ikl.  The original
> object name will be in the text. So, if a program is running and you
> recompile, the old program will still be in the job stack until the user
> ends the program.   The next instances will always get the new program
> because the rename process prevents them from calling the old.
> __________________________________________________________
> 
> Thanks but this is totally unrelated to the situation I am describing.
> First of all, the program to be moved or recompiled is NOT running!
> Second, we are forcing the object into qrplobj  with a cl movobj command
> within our inhouse software program that we use to do moves and
> recompiles. The name is not being changed, there is no Q appended by the
> system-this is inhouse software forcing the "move" of the existing object
> with the same name to qrplobj just before moving the new object into
> production.  What I need to know is what the OS might do with the object
> because of this force??  Is it possible that there is a change in the OS
> between release 2 and 4 (which we upgraded to just before seeing this
> strange behavior) that might cause problems resolving to the "correct"
> object?? Thanks anyway.
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.