RE: Simple Console

["John P. Walsh" <john_walsh@xxxxxxxx>]

I have to wonder if putting QSYSOPR in break mode will defeat the purpose.
There are a lot of messages generated there and for the most part they can
be ignored.  It seems to me that you would like to made aware of only those
messages that need a reply.

Just today my IBM CE installed Service Directore functions that will
generate messages to four usernames upon certain events happening.  It also
sends a message to Rochester concerning the system event.  In theory they
will then contact me.  Unfortunately, the internal messages are not sent in
break mode as I would like.

Does anyone know of a way to have these Service Directore generated messages
sent in break mode?

John P. Walsh
**************************************************************
| Thanks to all of you, there were some good ideas in the replies, several I
| plan to at least investigate. I think setting the message queue to break
| will do what I need, at least for starters. I am trying to find
| out now, if
| the QSYSOPR queue is in break mode, how many & which type users
| will get the
| breaks?
|
| Thanks to all,
| Bob
|
|
| >big snip<
| >
| > Is putting the QSYSOPR message queue into break mode not
| > sufficient for you?
| >
| >another big snip<
|

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---