|
There is a certain procedure that runs in a batch job that uses the job date for a lookup. I did not write this procedure, but there is now a problem with it. Before, our users would type in // DATE 12/24/99 and the job date would change to 12/24/99 when the sbmjob was ran, and everything went fine. But, someone came to me today and said he ran this job to get a report and it came out 0. I did the procedure myself, changed the jobdate to 12/24/99 with // date 12/24/99 and ran it, then looked at the job when it was running and it has a job date of 01/03/2000. I then went to find out where else I could change the job date and did a CHGJOB and prompted, hit F9, scrolled down and saw a jobdate field, that already had the value 122499 in it. Is this a Y2K bug? Is there a work around? Regards, Jim Langston +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.