|
Fujitsu has a version of Fortran which implements objects. And I disagree with you that, because languages have advanced to the current level that langugages like dylan, algol, pascal, and oberon are now to be considered low level languages. And where did you come up with the term mid level? Asm is a low level language because it lacks strong typing (I hope I dont start a thread on typing ! ) it also lacks builtin functions for string handeling, and high math like abs(), cos() ... We can say, I think, that a high level language is one which is most abstract and bears the least obvious correspondence between the language syntactic structure and the machine code. In this definition the NUMBER of machine instructions bears no relevance. A high level language is not called a high level language because it generates a huge wad of machine code when compiled. It is so called because it it bears a closer resemblance to human language than to machine language. There is no such thing as a mid level language. pshaw! A 3GL is another level inserted between human readable language and and machine readable. 3GL's are inserted between, lets say english and RPG (in the case of AS/SET) and the 3GL generates NOT compiled machine code but pre-compiled RPG (language code). This AS/SET (3GL) generated RPG is then compiled into machine code. 3GL's add a layer of abstraction if you want to call it that, in that a programmer need not learn RPG, or C, or C++ in order to generate code in these languages. Jim Langston wrote: > I tend to agree with this timeline, but you also have to > look at the fact that in the 1960's Algol would of been > considered a high level language, but if you take that same > Algol now it is considered quite a low level language. > > I think that the terms low, middle and high level are two > abstract. I think that's where the generation terms came > from. I remember in the 70's and 80's everyone was > talking about 3rd generation languages that would come > along soon. I guess they are here with OOPs and such. > > I think I was thinking more along the lines of 3rd generation > languages being high level, 2nd generation being middle level, > and 1st generation being low level. > > But heck, it's just not that simple anymore. Languages can > just do so much and have so many differences maybe the > concepts of low level and high level languages have become > obsolete. Although everyone would agree that Assembly would > be a low level language by any definition. > > Have we come to the age where assembly is low level, and all > other programming languages are now high level? > > boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote: > > > <SNIP> > > 1940's - bare hardware > > 1950's - operations were abstracted - Fortran > > 1960's - control structures were abstracted - Algol > > 1970's - data structures were abstracted - Pascal, C > > 1980's - module interfaces were abstracted - Modula > > 1990's - abstraction of objects - C++, Java > > <SNIP> > > Remember Delphi (Pascal), VB (Basic), and just about > every language that does objects now. Although I tend > to doubt if Fortran or Cobol does objects, and I've yet to > see an object in RPG. > > Does that mean RPG is stuck in the 80's? > > Regards, > > Jim Langston > > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- -- L. S. Russell Programmer/Analyst Datrek Professional Bags, Inc. 2413 Industrial Drive Springfield, TN. 37172 mailto:leslier@datrek.com http://www.datrek.com -- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.