• Subject: Re: ASC-Sequel
  • From: "Jack Mullins" <jmullins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:00:18 -0600
  • Organization: Sun Industries, Inc.


We use Sequel extensively here at Sun.  We do all of what you have mentioned
and more with the product and it does an extremely nice job.  In fact, we
have literally become dependant on Sequel; it has been integrated into so
many of our daily operations that we couldn't function without it.  Also, we
have always received excellent support from ASC.  I don't have any
experience with any of their competitors but I would bet that Sequel would
be hard to beat, I don't think you will be disappointed.


Jack Mullins
P.O. Box 2026
Jonesboro, AR 72402

Hi All,

We are looking at using outfiles instead of printfiles for a lot of our
reports.  We are leaning towards using ASC-Sequel report writer.  Has anyone
had experiences good or bad with their product?  Many of the reports we want
to write will need to use promptable parms to generate the reports,  some of
these parms will come from our programs and then call the Sequel product
through a batch or other command.

Also many of the outfiles will also be accessed from PCs for mail merges.

Any thoughts, comments, or suggestions.

Ron Klein

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].