• Subject: Re: Prereq's for Hiper Group PTF's
  • From: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:41:18 -0500

We recently installed:

        Cumulative PTF package 99420 (I almost said PTF tape)
        HIPER PTF package 99090
        Y2K PTF package 99200

We had no problems with pre- or co-requisites; each set of CDs loaded
without problems; on our 640s the IPL took an extra 1-1/2 hours.  On our
remote machines (much, much smaller) only added 1/2 to 1 hour extra.

--Paul E Musselman

>I went to the web site
>and noticed the hiper group PTF's.  My question is:  If I order and
>install the latest cum,
>and then the Hiper group PTF's, will I have any concern about prereq's,
>coreq's or other such
>animals?  For example one HIPER for V4R3 is SF59210.  It lists as a prereq
>SF58916.  Neither
>SF58916, nor it's supersede of SF59147, are on cum 9243, (according to
>I am not ordering using SNDPTFORD.  For one thing, IBM and the 400 are not
>e-business ready, (lack of TCP/IP for SNDPTFORD).  Also I like the
>tracking available when using

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].