Re: PTF question -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

> I am looking at applying the latest CUM, database group and y2k group
> PTF's. Now I'm wondering if it would be a bad move to stick them on
> all at once via go PTF 8, apply all group CD's without IPL and the CUM
> last with IPL.
> Or would it be better to IPL after each group (3 IPL's)?

If it were me, I would do each separately, with IPLs in between each
set.  I have no idea of the probability percent that it would be OK
without intervening IPLs.  (For all I know, thousands of shops could be
doing it all the time.)  In my shop I would just play it safe.

-Jeff
jlcrosby@fwi.com
Voice: 219-422-7531  Fax: 219-426-0212



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.