× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: AnyNet/400 performance question
  • From: "Simon Coulter" <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Oct 99 17:06:23 +1000


I'm back (and the first messages I see are about expensive op-codes .... 
aaarrrggh!), anyway I 
am having a "discussion" regarding Anynet performance.

While I know that using Anynet will cause the encapsulated applications to run 
slower than their 
native counterparts (i.e., SNA over IP will run slower than native SNA, and IP 
over SNA will run 
slower than native IP), the discussion is revolving around the last sentence in 
a statement in 
the Communications Configuration manual.

"   Note:  Specifying ALWANYNET(*YES) allows all AnyNet/400 support. In other
          words, this network attribute affects not only APPC over TCP/IP
          support but also sockets over SNA support. Furthermore, sockets
                                                     --------------------
          applications run more slowly when ALWANYNET(*YES) is specified."
          ---------------------------------------------------------------

I do not believe simply turning on AnyNet will noticably slow down native 
sockets applications.

Assume a TCP network running native sockets applications.  Assume I need to use 
an SNA 
application but the network routers will not route SNA so I can't run both TCP 
and SNA over the 
same pipe.  I enable AnyNet and configure the SNA application to use AnyNet 
thus encapsulating 
the SNA data stream and allowing primitive routers to handle it.  The SNA 
application will run 
slower due to AnyNet's insertion in the stack but the existing native TCP 
sockets applications 
should still run at their normal speed.

The only reason I can determine for the sockets applications to perform slower 
is that AnyNet 
doesn't know it is supposed to only handle SNA and so checks the host table (or 
DNS) for a 
sysname.netid.SNA.COM.IBM entry to relate IP addresses to SNA devices which 
shouldn't add a huge 
overhead.

How say you all?

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
«» FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists       «»
«» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400.  «»
«»                                                                «»
«» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175      Mobile: +61 0411 091 400           «»
«» Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175      mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au      «»
«»                                                                «»
«» Windoze should not be open at Warp speed.                      «»
«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.