• Subject: Re: CL improvements
  • From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:36:30 -0700
  • Organization: Conex Global Logistics Services, Inc.

Actually, I have been wanting subroutines and for loops in CL for a long
long time.  You can emulate subroutines by either using another CL program
and calling that, but I've never liked that concept.

And for loops are great when you want to do something more than once
dependent on whatever criteria you want.

JCLs always seem to be lacking though.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Tim McCarthy wrote:

> Forgive me for being a killjoy here, but do we REALLY NEED these sort of
> enhancements in CL? Subroutines? FOR loops? I'd much rather IBM focused
> its' efforts elsewhere.

<SNIP>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.