|
>>"Schenck, Don" wrote: >> Funny ... I don't REMEMBER 1600 being a leap year ... >No, it wasn't. But they didn't use leap seconds then either. ;-) >The Gregorian calendar had just been introduced that century(!?!? or was >it the one before?) Remember that in 173x (close to there) we lost 3 or 4 days when they corrected the calandar. See if that those missing days are a valid *ISO date. They shouldn't be because they never happened. John Carr +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.