|
If they go to LAN and blow away the twinax can use a virtual IP address that a router would send to one of the systems. That way is one system fails, the router switches the traffic to the other system. The two AS400s have unique IP address and can communicate using them. You can also reach the AS400s with there unique IP which would be useful for administration purposes. You just have to have a powerful enough router to handle the traffic. We use this for people coming in through the internet. They never know, or care, what system they are really attached to. For local users using CA, they will have to restart their connection in case the primary system fails. I don't know all the details for setting up or hardware/software required but a good network administrator can do that part. Good Luck, Christopher K. Bipes mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com Sr. Programmer/Analyst mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com CrossCheck, Inc. http://www.cross-check.com 6119 State Farm Drive Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102 Rohnert Park CA 94928 Fax: 707 586-1884 -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Silberberg [mailto:jsilberberg@mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 10:14 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Twinax, IP and 5250 emulation.. Hey All, Have a client with two AS/400 systems tied together in a redundant configuration with Mimix and LAN's and all the good stuff. Currently on V3R7 getting ready to do to V4R[3/4].. As part of this configuration they have about 15 workstations on Twinax and a BIG switch that moves the entire operation center from the B Twinax controller on system-A to the B Twinax Controller on system-B. Now, the issue is that it is getting hard to find Twinax emulation support that does all of the newer functions, so they are looking at IP options, but I was first wondering what people are using today for this more traditional configuration on high speed PCI bus Win/[98/NT] workstations. Synapse, Netsoft, Full CA/400, Other ?? and what PCI bus adapters out there are ROCK SOLID ?? Second, with IP on Twinax available, has anyone used this in a failover environment where the SWITCH is thrown and the workstations just reconnect to the B system. I would assume that both the A and B systems would have the same IP address, and that the fail over CLP control process would just bring the interface online/offline. But what about route entries ? Can the same IP address be quote active on both systems with the new HACMP support as long as the actual workstations in the subnet can only get to one of the controllers. AKA the BIG switch. Third, with LPAR and HACMP functions in 4.4 what are the rules / constraints for IP address definition and failover ? Are they documented some where, or better yet has anyone installed and tested such a configuration ? TIA, Jeff Silberberg.. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.