× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: X-Spec (was: "RPG isn't cool")
  • From: Carsten Flensburg <novasol@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:01:20 +0200
  • Organization: Novasol

Hi Doug,
>
> I'm all for using BIFs with new code, but wouldn't it be nice to have
> legacy code nicely formatted too?  To me, it seems "cleaner" to have
> the conversion indent it properly and add EOF(50) or whatever than to
> switch to fixed format for the line.
> 
> What do you think? 

I certainly do agree that it would be a good thing to have an option to
automatically convert to CF, on the other hand I have a strong feeling
that IBM won't build a utility to ease the conversion to the CF-specs.

Depending on the final implementation of the CF-specs it would raise the
many valid concerns that you mention - and as I've experienced during my
RPG/IV-crusade so far, it's not only a question of new functions and
semantics being made available: The whole process of structuring and
modelling an application has changed dramatically with the introduction
ILE and RPG/IV - even the best RPG/IV conversion tools I've seen so far
are only capable of - more or less - replacing code line by line.

I have converted some of our legacy applications to take advantage of
f.x. date arithmetic and performance improvements, but the application
as such is still based on the RPG/400 specifications limitations in
terms of structure and design.

Given the fact that CF-specs doesn't add new functions not available to
C-specs I see them as a tool to further improve flow, structure and
readability in RPG/IV programs - in the case of converting legacy
programs the outcome I think will be closely related to the programs
current state in this respect. Based on this assumption I'd say that -
in this shop - the CF-specs would primarily find their way into new
applications.

What's the state of things in your shop in that respect?

Best regards,
Carsten Flensburg

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.