Re: SNADS over TCP/IP?

["Brigitte Caura" <caura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IBM has suggested to change all our Passthrough sessions by TELNET, but ...

TELNET does not have any of the options SNA Passthrough has:

On Passthrough you can indicate directly signon definitions (like initial
pgm)        .
And you can indicate a SYSRQS pgm:

We signon on different remote systems and our systemrequest pgm starts a
local groupjob, keeping the different remote sessions open.

AFAIK, TELNET has no option whatsoever to do this ....


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com>
Aan: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Datum: mercredi 31 mars 1999 6:33
Onderwerp: Re: SNADS over TCP/IP?


>>Use telnet.  It's not bad coming from a 400 to a 400.  In fact you can't
>>tell - EXCEPT that you do a SIGNOFF ENDCNN(*YES) versus ENDPASTHR.
>>
>>jteff19@idt.net on 03/25/99 04:38:46 PM
>
>
>We wrapped the system command in our own program and do an ENDCNN(*YES) for
>every signoff.  Kicks you back from whence you came every time.
>
>Or: CHGCMDDFT on the Signoff command to make ENDCNN(*YES) the default.  If
>my brain still works, I believe there is enough system-level message
>handling to deal with the ENDCNN from a non-passed-through connection.
>
>--Paul E Musselman
>PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com
>
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
>+---
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---