My .02 is that this operating system resides in the public domain (great).
No one company owns it (good) but also no one is really plotting a course
for it (bad).
I know you can buy commercial versions (Red Hat) but you can also get free
versions off of the web.
I also agree that it won't replace OS/400 but it can all ready replace NT
and UNIX in a lot of circumstances (IBM would love that).
I also read somewhere that Linux as it exists today supports clustering
which NT can do but only in small groups.
From: Pat Barber [SMTP:MBOCEANSIDE@postoffice.worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: CNN / InfoWorld article on Linux vs. NT (with
some AS/400 referen ces)
Does anybody besides me find it funny that IBM is now looking
at Linux(Unix Lite) >>>>>>> I do not wish to participate in any
W/xx finger pointing,
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact