|
My two cents.... Windows interfaces definitely have their place and in front of a "normal" green screen isn't it. However, they do "look pretty and new" when compared to the clunky look of a 5250. Their place is when click and drag is enabled and usable. This takes some imagination and changing the way we think of AS/400 screens..... We are implementing a new payroll system with the pretty GUI for the casual users. I expect the heads down, get the work done people to turn it off. Ed Tate (etate01@sun.hazelwood.k12.mo.us) Coordinator of Technology Hazelwood School District 15955 New Halls Ferry Florissant, MO 63031 314-953-5090 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com > [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of James W Kilgore > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 5:02 AM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: GUI > > > Paul, > > For the "heads down" folks, we just took the mouse. There is always > some casual user that needs a new one because theirs got gummed up with > too much dust. :-) > > Tab, arrow, arrow, arrow, enter, sign on, stay on, sign off, go home. > > No mouse required, non offered. > > Personally I've seen an office staff double to handle the workload under > a gimp interface. Sure did look good. Made it easy for the new > people. Pain in the A** for anyone there more than 30 days that wanted > to get their job done. Had to remind the newbies that they could > actually -PRESS- F3 instead of pointing to it and clicking. > > Since they put the mouse w-a-a-a-y out of reach and had to s-t-r-e-t-c-h > to get it, shake it once or twice to find out where the pointer was at, > roll, pick up and roll again, (like a wind up toy) and carefully slow > down the closer you get and then click! voila ... 5 seconds to make a > single key stroke! > > Now -THAT'S- progress! > > Isn't data entry measured by keystrokes/hour anymore? Must have > converted to CPW. Of course the "unconstrained" rating has to be green. > :-) > > OK, so now that I've had my fun I'll talk up the good points. > > Let's take an application suite and an explorer interface. The left > window would list applications (authorized by user) with boxed + signs > to indicate "more". Click the + box on, let's say Payroll, and a list of > subjects may appear (employees, deductions, accruals, tax tables, etc.), > click the subject you desire (like "Employee") and General Information, > Pay-to, Assigned deductions, Earnings history, Pay history, etc. may > appear on the right window. > > At this point, like Operations Navigator, you have replaced the menu > function. Beyond that, a "green screen" function may suffice your > application requirements. Finding it is the half the battle of using > it. > > IMHO, a gimp interface is perfect for "after the fact" data extraction > and infrequent access, but is not the appropriate tool for data entry > beyond program loading. Neither GUI nor green is "wrong", no more than > using a sledge hammer is "wrong". Unless, of course, you are trying to > use it to hang a picture. Inappropriate is the word that comes to mind. > > We can "have it all". The best of both worlds. In their proper place. > Now "proper" is the point of lively debate! :-) Does a drop down box > replace F4 or is it just different? Modern? (whatever that means) > > Heck, I'm on a roll now so I might as well pick on Dean. ;-) > > Now, Dean, if I recall, you have been very pleased with the 5250 > enhanced subfile scroll bar. This is a nice GUI concession, but let me > ask you, just out of curiosity, have you studied how many people park on > the arrow down, hypnotized by the scrolling subfile, vs the "page down" > bangers, or "position to" users? What is the average time (cost), by > method, to obtain the desired entry? > > Actually, I'm not really picking on you Dean, it's just that you have > posted a couple of kudos' for the enhanced 5250 display so I'm just > using it as a point of discussion for GUI importance. IMHO, give a user > a slower method, they will use it. Sort of like a job expands to the > time allotted, junk accumulates to the size of your garage, etc. > > As an old student of time/motion studies for increased efficiency and > also a student of marketing, the struggle with GUI vs green will > probably be a never ending balancing act. Being German born, I have to > admit that efficiency votes 51%. > > James W. Kilgore > email@James-W-Kilgore.com > > P.S. In dealing with the pure capitalists, we count 20 users doing 200 > lookups, each, per day, at 2 seconds each occurrence, for 250 days per > year, at a national average labor cost per hour equals $8,000 per year, > total, compared to the training costs for a pure green environment and > cost of GUI development. Of course if you have 200 users, doing 400 > lookups each the math totally changes. > Somewhere between number of users, number of lookups per day, labor > rate, response time by method, turnover, training cost, etc. GUI > justifies itself. Maybe. > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > +--- > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.