× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: random i/o and relative efficiency
  • From: Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 13:28:30 -0800

First I've heard of the AS/400 random file.  I was thinking of random I/O in
the sense of random access by key.  Didn't mean to be controversial.  

My real question was is a READE cheaper than a CHAIN, and if so, by how
much?  

More generally, does anyone have benchmark data on the various file opcodes.
I've done a lot with unkeyed sequential files--semi acceptable place for
FMTDTA--but I'm curious about the relative costs of using the access path (I
know, RRN too) opcodes. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Barber [mailto:MBOCEANSIDE@postoffice.worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 3:50 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: random i/o and relative efficiency
> 
> 
> david.kahn@gbwsh.mail.abb.com wrote:
> > 
> > Pat Barber <MBOCEANSIDE@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
> > 
> > >Large "random" files can really blaze with a binary search,BUT,
> > >the file has to be in some order...which sort of defeats the random
> > >concept... stick with keyed index files....
> > 
> > Pat,
> > 
> > Are you perhaps confusing "random" with "relative"? AIUI 
> Joel's example
> > _is_ with an indexed file. The choice is between:
> 
> Maybe I misread the note, but as a side note, there was and still is
> a "random" file on the 400 which is accessed by relative record number
> but proably not used by over 2 people in the whole world any more....
> this was a carry over from long,long ago on the older 3/X boxes... but
> as I said earlier, I could have misread the whole thing....
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.