× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: AS/400 Gasping For Air ??
  • From: "Dennis Lovelady" <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 23:36:04 -0500

Hi, Simon:

>12 years is too low.  Much of the code in OS/400 came from the
>System/38.  That's why OS/400 is known as XPF
>internally.  eXtended control Program Facility -- many of you
>will remember the OS for the S/38 was called
>CPF.  The new lads and lassies have just learned something --
>does that make me a geezer or do I have to
>remember toggling in the bootstrap code in Octal before
>I qualify?  So lets average over 20 years.

Yes, these make for much more reasonable numbers or workers on the project of
O/S.  What I was trying to resolve, is whether IBM uses that number in fact,
or only in estimating a project (I believe that the LOC estimate came from
the IBM consulting group, unless I misremember).  The original comments were
stating that a project was going to take a certain amount of time, because of
the 2000 LOC/year/person, so I used a roundabout way of getting a
demonstration of those numbers in practice.  Thank you for doing so, Simon.
As it turns out, the numbers would seem to be at least palpable, given your
explanation of the "project" at hand.  I have no doubt of your expertise in
this area - you and I go back a ways.  :^)

Of course, a very large portion of that (or any) project would be in design,
information gathering, "how to," user discussions, organization, file
layouts, database design, process structure, goal definition, documentation,
redesign, etc.  Probably, this is on the order of more than 50% of the
project.  (Out of curiosity, what's a reasonable % for this sort of
overhead?)  Given that the original question had to do with replacing an
existing system, I still have to wonder if the estimate was not tremendously
overstated, since most of that work has already been done (assuming that the
new product will be an exact or near emulation of the original).  Still, the
budgeted amount of the time would seem to be much too small for the project
at hand.

Thanks for your patience, Simon.
--
Dennis Lovelady                    Simpsonville, SC
mail: dennis@lovelady.com
URL:  http://lovelady.piedmont.net
ICQ:  5734860
--
I just forgot my whole philosophy of life!!!


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.