|
James W. Kilgore wrote: >My company has been providing RPG based solutions for a looooong >time. We've recently been looking at Linux as a communications >server for our AS/400 shops. > >Now from recent news/rumors ... News: IBM will offer DB2 for free >(free is good) for Linux. Rumor: IBM will support/port Linux to >the IPCS. News flash via David: Linux will support RPG. Sounds >more like complimentary then competitive to us! ;-) > >From our view point, it just makes the AS/400 more competitive to >those shops that care about uptime. And broadens our market base. > Can we say win/win? I knew you could. :-) First off, my opinions regarding this issue should definitely not be confused with official company policy. Actually, I don't even know if there is an official company policy regarding Linux! Yes, IBM has made available a free, unsupported version of DB2. And yes, IBM has even released an open-source Java compiler! But regarding the Linux on IPCS rumor (and other rumors), the official position is that if it hasn't been officially announced, it doesn't exist! And now on to my personal opinions and observations: I've been an avid Linux user at home since June. I knew for a long time that I'd probably have to make the switch from OS/2 to Linux, and when IBM announced the dropping of support for an important internal OS/2 based tool, I took that as a strong hint! (Actually, I still use OS/2 at work after finding a workaround to the tool that was dropped.) In the past decade, companies have been moving to a "fat client" client-server model in their systems, and IBM has done a good job in meeting customer demands. Unfortunately, a lot of the expected benefits have not materialised and solutions tend to be more expensive and less efficient than traditional "green screen" solutions. A few years ago, some companies tried to push the concept of "network computers", but that seems to have fizzled as the cost of "fat client" machines dropped. So, the pendulum seems to be swinging back and forth looking for an acceptable middle ground. I think you can see where I'm headed with this. It is my humble opinion that Linux has a definite place in this middle ground. A Linux workstation can be set up to look as pretty as MS-Widows, but without it's bloat, and with greater reliability, easier maintenance, lower cost, and almost infinite configurability. Although I don't think anyone within IBM would be upset if MS loses market share to Linux in the workstation market, I think the server market might be more contentious since Linux might be seen as much of a competitor as NT (aka the W2K bug). But whereas Linux servers are much more reliable that NT, let's face it - nothing matches the AS/400 in terms of reliability, not even Linux! But Linux serves a somewhat different segment of the server market. Let's say you need to add a firewall, or a simple file, print, or web server, and you have no budget. OK, just dust off that old 486 machine gathering dust in the back room, plug in a spare network card, install Linux, and you're off and running. You've spent practically nothing, and you have a better server than if you spent a couple of thousand dollars on an NT server! Like I said before, I have no idea how IBM will deal with Linux in the future. Many people in positions of power still don't even know what it's all about. When I asked a manager if I could claim the cost of Linux on my educational allowance, his answer was "Sure! Uh, what's Linux?"! Overall, I agree with you that Linux can complement the AS/400 quite nicely. However, the open-source model that has made Linux the success it is today means that the users of these systems have to be more active in implementing and sharing code. This is a business model that many users and companies, especially large companies like IBM, aren't used to. But then again, in this business, the only constant is change, right? Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.