Re: fake out system

Seems to  me that you are adding   a bit more confusion to an already
problematical mission. What   is the   suggested  method to keep  these
temporary  fixes documented so they are  used   properly and considered  as
future development and changes  occur?

Sounds  like trouble?


Glenn
_____________________________________________
Glenn Ericson,          Phoenix Consulting                      
P O Box 701164   East Elmhurst NY 11370-3164 USA                            
Phone 718 898 9805       Fax 718 446 1150
AS/400 & Year 2000- - Solutions Specialists
 © 1998 copyright,  all rights reserved
____________________________________________


______________________________ Reply Separator _________
At 01:52 PM 9/24/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>     1. Create DDS for replacement file, make sure field begin/end 
>     positions match your pgm described record layout. Pad blank fields 
>     as necessary. Add your new date field to the end of the new record. 
>     2. Rename old file. 
>     3. Create new file.  
>     4. CPFY old new FMTOPT(*NOCHK)
>     
>     The upside: programs that don't use the date probably won't need to 
>     be changed at all. No recompiling required there. Modify programs 
>     that use the datefld to use the external defs.
>     
>     Downside: this could get REALLY confusing until all programs are 
>     converted to using external defs. This won't work at all if you use 
>     COPYFILE to maintain the files. Whenever you'd do the COPYFILE, 
>     DELETE, RENAME , you'd end up without ext defs. 
>     
>     There's lots of gotchas in here. I'm sure I don't remember very 
>     many of them. For one, you might need to create your file w/ 
>     LVLCHK(*NO). Also, I'm not sure if the record format name needs to 
>     be the same as your file name. If it's a keyed file, do the key 
>     field names need to be K00001? I'm not sure.... 
>     
>     I know that you can make this scenario work. I've done it before. 
>     It's just been too many years/margaritas since I figured it out..
>     
>     hth
>     eric.delong@pmsi-services.com
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
>Subject: fake out system 
>Author:  <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > at INET_WACO
>Date:    9/24/98 11:23 AM
>
>
>I have run into a small problem on a system that I have to Y2k 
>convert...
>     
>The system has many program described files, BUT, the one file that 
>requires
>adding a new date format ccyymmdd doesn't have any more 
>space.....soooooo
>     
>I have thought about somthing along these lines:
>     
>1. create external specs for file with DDS adding new date field 
>2. create a logical with an exact layout of internal described file less 
>new field
>3. rename external described file to some other name 
>4. rename logical to original internal described name
>     
>I'll still have to modify any program that uses dates but a lot of them 
>don't
>really use the date,,, so that cuts out a LOT of conversion time.....
>     
>As time permits, I'll go back and fix all programs to use new external 
>description....
>     
>Is there some downside to doing the conversion this way ?????? 
>+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---