RE: Tape Drives: 9427 vs 3590 (not exactly a contest... <G>)

9427 simply uses 7208 7/14GB drives, so here's a comparison of 7208 (222
or 234) 7GB to 3590:

Tape Drive              Un-Compressed transfer rate
7208-222/234                    500K/sec (.5M/sec)
3590-B11                        9M/sec                                  
3570                            2.2M/sec


Note - also the new 7208-342 8mm:
                                3M/sec



Neil Palmer                                AS/400~~~~~      
NxTrend Technology - Canada   ____________          ___  ~     
Thornhill, Ontario,  Canada   |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
Phone: (905) 731-9000  x238   |__________|_|______|_|______)   
Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x238    oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
Fax:   (905) 731-9202       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com    AS/400  The Ultimate Business Server      
http://www.NxTrend.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Lewis [SMTP:CLEWIS@IQUEST.NET]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 2:36 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Tape Drives: 9427 vs 3590 (not exactly a contest... <G>)
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Anyone know what the transfer rate of the IBM 9427 is as compared to
> the
> IBM 3590 ?
> 
> I KNOW that the 3590 kicks the 9427's BUTT, but at what comparison
> rate
> ?
> 
> I left a place with a 3590 and am TRYING to get used to the 9427...
> 
> Also, those of you using 9427's - are you happy with them ?
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> Chuck
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---