|
Hans and Jon, I used to want this exact ability more until the (N) option was added to chain, read, and reade for record locking control. I would still like to add my support for this option as I have programs that need to simultaneously use a file by key and by relative record. The file has few enough records to justify not using a separate LF and more than other storage methods can justify. Roger Vicker, CCP John Hall wrote: > I agree. What about a PFILE keyword. > > FDATAFILE IF E .... > FDATAFILE2 IF E .... PFILE(LIB/DATAFILE) RENAME(REC:REC2) > > Very simple to implement. No CL program required just to compile the > program. No wasted time or effort. > > How about it IBM ? > > John Hall > Home Sales Co. -- *** Vicker Programming and Service *** Have bits will byte *** http://www.vicker.com/vicker/vps.html *** Most bugs are real sons of glitches. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.