Re: Design shift of view

Pete,

In a message dated 98-07-24 00:22:33 EDT, you write:

> At 11:08 07/23/98 -0400, Buck Calabro wrote:
>  Snip...
>  >The current mind-set doesn't take into account the costs involved with 
>  >promoting 24x7 applications into production (i.e. if I want to promote a 
>  >DSPF to production
>  
>  Actually, it's not absolutely required. If you create a temporary version
of 
> the *DSPF (different name), and compile the program to use it, you can wait 
> until the permanent display is no longer allocated, then compile it and 
> recompile the program with the correct file name. It's a bit of a hassle,
but 
> nobody gets kicked off the system and the job does get done...

But then our CMS's get junked up with audit trails for non-existent objects!
Audit would eat us _alive_!

Regards!

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"One of the greatest labor-saving inventions of today is tomorrow." -- Vincent
T. Foss
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---