RE: Remote office connection

[Lamart@xxxxxxxxx]

Sorry, it did sound like I was saying that the AS/400 security amounted to
"none".  Bad wording on my part.  What I meant to say was adding an
additional level of security couldn't be all that bad.  (unless that
security proved to be unsecure).

Lamar Thomas
Lamart@aldon.com <mailto:Lamart@aldon.com> 


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   James W. Kilgore [mailto:qappdsn@ibm.net]
                Sent:   Thursday, July 16, 1998 8:17 PM
                To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
                Subject:        Re: Remote office connection



                Lamart@aldon.com wrote:

                > I agree about NT's security.  The point I was just trying
to make is that I
                > think another level of security in front of your AS/400
has got to be better
                > then none.

                <<snip>>

                Personally I don't believe that AS/400 security equates to
"none".

                +---
                | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
                | To submit a new message, send your mail to
MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
                | To subscribe to this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
                | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
                | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
                +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---