• Subject: Re: AS/400 History
  • From: endre enyedy <e_enyedy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:26:14 -0400

Goins, Kirk : CO IR wrote:
> Your Friend is right, they came out, out of order.
>  ----------
> From: Steven Sharpe
> To: midrange-l@lhs.org
> Subject: AS/400 History
> Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 11:24AM
> I am having a debate over AS/400 history and I'm hoping someone on the
> List
> can settle it.  What was the order of computer platforms introduced by
> IBM -
> (System 36, System 38, AS/400)?
> I say the order was 36, 38, 400.  My friend says it was 38, 36, 400.
> Could
> someone help me settle this?

First it was the S/3, then came the S/32 - which was followed by the
The S/38  followed with its completely different architecture : the "T
but "Tomorrow's Machine" just never quite arrived.
The S/36  was the 16 bit upgrade to the s/34, then came the AS line
(wasn't it called Clearlake or somesuch?)

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].