RE: AS/400 History

I think it was System/3 and 36, then System 38.  The Sys/38 had 
 S36 emulation from almost day one.  How could it emulate a 
machine that didn't already exist?

So I agree with you, not your friend.

Of course, it could be argued that the 36 was not in the direct 
blood line at all.  But did become a relative by marriage when 
the 236 & 436 where introduced.  And then with V3R7 running SSP, 
we now have inbreeding. And without the normal genetic 
consequences!

Regards,
Bob Crothers
Cornerstone Communications
www.FaxServer401.com


-----Original Message-----
From:   Steven Sharpe [SMTP:ssharpe@accucomm.net]
Sent:   Wednesday, July 08, 1998 1:24 PM
To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject:        AS/400 History

I am having a debate over AS/400 history and I'm hoping someone 
on the List
can settle it.  What was the order of computer platforms 
introduced by IBM -
(System 36, System 38, AS/400)?

I say the order was 36, 38, 400.  My friend says it was 38, 36, 
400.  Could
someone help me settle this?

Thanks!
--
Steven Sharpe       --  steven_sharpe@bigfoot.com
Sharpe Consulting --  sharpeconsulting@hotmail.com  -- (912) 
328-9066
        AS/400 Consulting

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to 
MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---