RE: Routing Users Queries to Specific JOBQ other than their JOBD JOB - IBM??????

[John Carr <74711.77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Message text written by INTERNET:MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>
>>John Carr wrote:
>>Bill
>>Have the all user profiles go to a jobq that is not active.  Have a
>>back ground job looking at the jobq and moving the jobs to the correct
>>jobq for that particular function.  Simple, easy to write and it
>>gives you the ability to split other jobs to different jobq's depending
>>on the job.

>Along these line. Could IBM (Jon?) give us a dtaq parm on JOBQs like we
have
>on OUTQs? Whenever a job was waiting on the jobq a dataqueue entry would
be
>sent and we could then move the job around to our heart's content. I can
>think of several (many) job queuing problems that this would solve.
>
>-Walden<


Unfortunately the DATQ on the OUTQ is virtually worthless for the rerouting
task at hand.
An entry is only made if the spool file goes into a ready(RDY) status. 
Many jobs write to the outq in many other statuses like HLD etc.   Which
never generate a DATQ entry at all.

I haven't used that technique for that reason.  And Yes I have written a
OUTQ rerouting utility from 
one AS/400 to another(actually between six of them).  

I think (as I said before) that it would be easy to write one for the JOBQ
need.

BTW -  Rochester would have to do the work,(DTAQ idea),  not Toronto.

John Carr
EdgeTech 

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---