|
Doc,
> I've done a little research in the V3R6/V3R7 manuals on threads...
>
> Anyway, I'm curious-- has anyone used these suckers? How good are they
> compared to Windows or Unix implementations? Are they worth the trouble?
They work. But they're not as lightweight as threads on Windows/Unix. On the
400, you'll get n+1 aditional group jobs for n threads.
The performance gets much better in V4Rx, 'cos IBM found out how 'bad' they
were for the Internet stuff (web-server, etc) they were doing... ;-)
--phil
(take a look at thread1 in phil_src@/qilecsrc)
--
Phil Hall
________________________________________________
email . . . . : hallp@ssax.com
phone(w). . . : (312) 258-6319
News/400 C/C++ Forum moderator at;
http://www.news400.com/c/index.htm
________________________________________________
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.