Re: NO queries in QGPL please!!

//--- forwarded letter -------------------------------------------------------
> Neil Palmer wrote:
> 
> > So they store queries in QGPL, I could ask "so what ?".  Admittedly it
> > may be easier to manage if they were placed in a separate library, but
> > the fact they are in QGPL isn't really going to cause any problems,
> > release upgrades or otherwise.  IBM doesn't mess with user objects in
> > QGPL during release updates.
> 
> Neil,
> 
> I'm not at all concerned about future OS upgrades, rather, system upgrades. I
> just went from CISC to RISC and I went through a bit of hastle to get the QGPL
> queries into my new system. It was a NEW BOX, so I restored from tape, 
>library by
> library to get the users queries up. Had I done that with QGPL, I would have 
>had
> "hilarious consequences" as portions of the old CISC OS overwrote members from
> the new V4R2 RISC OS. That would suck!!
> 
> Paul
> 

Hello Paul,

If you instruct the restore process to only restore *NEW objects (that is those 
which don't 
currently exist in QGPL) you should be fine.

RSTxxx OPTION(*NEW)

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

//----------------------------------------------------------
// FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists
// Phone: +61 3 9419 0175      Mobile: +61 3 0411 091 400
// Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175      E-mail: shc@flybynight.com.au
// 
// Windoze should not be open at Warp speed.
 

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---