× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Numerics PACKED, ODD format -- Always recommended?
  • From: bvining@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Mar 98 13:42:21 CST

A minor point, but it's really selected compilers (and not *PGMs in
general) that internally default numeric data declarations to packed.
The DDS PFILE/LFILE and non-RPGII RPG compilers do; but I seem to recall
that RPGII and COBOL default to zoned decimal.  Likewise, it is up to
the compiler to determine what numeric formats to normalize to for
arithmetic operations.  C, for instance, conforms to a different set of
rules than, say, RPG.

Bruce Vining

>
>PGMs on the AS400 internally default numeric data to packed, translating zoned
>fields before use. Even length packed fields require the first nibble to be
>zero, which has no impact on DASD, but which does slightly impact performance.
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.